Society for Conservation Biology

A global community of conservation professionals

  • Member Login
  • Contact
Forgot Password?
Join Contribute Jobs
working-groups image


Current work of the RCWBG is organized through task-oriented committees, which cover different Strategic Foci.

Committees active at present are:

Capacity Building Committee

Religion and Conservation Biology Research Collaborative

Best Practice Guidelines Committee

Capacity Building Committee

Rationale and background

To bridge the gap between ‘vision’ and ‘action’, the new Strategic Plan of the RCBWG identifies ‘strengthening the Group’ as the first Strategic Focus for the next four years. The rationale is that a larger and more structured group will be more likely to mobilize the necessary resources to realize a diverse and ambitious portfolio. In order to ensure the implementation of this pivotal Strategic Focus, we hereby propose the creation of a specific Capacity-Building Committee (CBC), which will run through 2016 or until fulfilment of its goals.

Goals & expected outputs

The Capacity-Building Committee of the RCBWG seeks to reinforce the structure of the RCBWG. This objective will be pursued through actions directed outwards, such as enlarging membership pool and increasing the Group’s visibility, as well as inwards, such as restructuring workflow procedures to enhance their effectiveness. The CBC aims to promote the RCBWG into a self-sustaining structure, capable of thriving and renewing itself independently of changes in member- and leadership over time. 

Strategies and Approaches

Consistently with mission and goals statement, the CBC will address three main Strategic Areas:

  1. Enhance group structure and procedures;
  2. Raise group visibility both within and outside SCB;
  3. Enlarge group membership both within and outside SCB.

Religion and Conservation Research Collaborative

Rationale and background

The Religion and Conservation Research Collaborative (RCRC) is a committee of the Religion and Conservation Biology Working Group (RCBWG) tasked with the goal of investigating, through empirical research, the role of religion in the quest for environmental conservation globally and translating results into policy action. The RCRC also proactively identifies societal problems as pertains to conservation that need policy action and through scientific research findings informs decision making and social change within the purview of religion and conservation.

In 2012, the RCRC issued a position statement on animal release in Asia. It was part of efforts by conservation scientists to seek religious support and cooperation in addressing the unsustainable practice of releasing animals as an act of compassion by religious practitioners in Asia and elsewhere. Recently, in September 2015, The Economist published a piece: "Animal Spirits - Releasing Animals into the Wild in Vogue - With Unwelcome Consequences". This news tells the conservation community that the situation in Asia is yet to be abated and probably worsening. The RCRC is therefore seeking to work with Asian colleagues and other concerned parties interested in conservation of biodiversity in Asia to heighten advocacy about this problem. However, empirical evidence is necessary to substantiate the impact of animal release on biodiversity, human health and the environment. On that backdrop, the RCRC has set up a team to look into this and collate scientific evidence on the impact of animal release to inform policy in Asia.

Priority tasks will involve:

  1. Identification and compilation of research findings on the impact of animal release on biodiversity
  2. Development of a policy brief on these findings
  3. Engaging the media, religious leaders, policy makers, intergovernmental agencies, national governments in Asia etc.

We envisage this advocacy will contribute significantly to influencing policy and legislature on the practice of animal release in Asia, attaining a balance of needs with religion and environmental conservation.

Best Practice Guidelines Committee

Rationale and background

Based on the wealth of SCB members’ experience in the field, best practices will be compiled to guide working with religious leaders and communities on research projects for which their understanding and support are valued and networking with other organizations will commence.

Strategies and Approaches

  1. Immediately begin collecting, reviewing, and analyzing the existing literature and other sources on guidelines for best practices when scientists engage religious communities in projects (to include efforts underway by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (sets standards for scientific research), the Alliance of Religions and Conservation, and various sacred sites initiatives. Susan is heading this initiative, so please forward sources directly to her at your earliest possible convenience.
  2. Follow SCB staff advice on submitting a 400 word article for inclusion in the SCB News Blog, SCB member newsletter and social media pages, and SCB listservs to seek from SCB members the practices they found helpful when approaching and working with religious communities as well as practices they found counterproductive to achieving positive outcomes of their projects (best date for submitting article currently under consideration to assure appropriate wording of data request to members).
  3. Based on the data collected from SCB members (#2), select some for presenting their stories/best practices during a symposium we will propose for the 2017 ICCB to be held in Latin America.
  4. Initiate drafting best practices guidelines at a workshop we will propose for an evening after the symposium (#3) is held at the 2017 ICCB.
  5. Produce draft guidelines and distribute to members of the RCBWG by September 1/World Day of Prayer or October 4/Feast Day of St. Francis of Assisi, 2017 (depends upon when the 2017 ICCB is held).Revise draft guidelines according to input (#5) and submit to the SCB
  6. Board for requesting SCB members to vote by 1 January 2018 on the proposed guidelines through a means the officers in conjunction with staff deem feasible for reaching all members.
  7. Based on SCB members’ votes, urge the SCB Board President to issue the guidelines for conservation biologists to consider following when seeking the collaboration of religious communities and to establish a link to the guidelines from the SCB web site.
  8. Initiate in 2018 workshops on the guidelines at area SCB meetings and annual meetings of the American Academy of Religion, the International Society for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, the International Society for Environmental Ethics, and others for information, reflection, and discussion.
  9. Plan to hold a symposium at the 2019 ICCB featuring successful outcomes from following best practices guidelines and soliciting recommendations for revisions.

Current Activities

Congress sessions and papers, policy statements

Partnerships with other WGs of the SCB

Partnerships with other organizations

Our Board member Bas Verschuuren, as chair of Cultural and Spiritual Values of Protected Areas (CSVPA), is liaising with the RCBWG on partaking the events they are organising. More info in the CSVPA website.